When to Shoot in RAW vs JPEG (and Why)

whentoshootinrawvsjpegandwhy
when to shoot in RAW vs JPEG and why

There has been a longstanding debate within the pictures community about RAW vs JPEG file codecs. Each have their advantages and drawbacks, so figuring out which one to exhaust isn’t as easy because it is possible you’ll perhaps declare.

Really, reasonably than extreme about RAW vs JPEG as a single resolution to affect, it’s most efficient to reframe the quiz entirely. So don’t mediate which structure to continuously exhaust.

As one more, mediate when to exhaust RAW and when to exhaust JPEG.

Notion RAW and JPEG codecs

Whenever you happen to’re unique to digital pictures, terms be pleased “RAW” and “JPEG” could possibly seem a small bit bizarre. So what if truth be told is a RAW photo? And what is a JPEG photo?

Whenever you press the shutter button in your camera, it takes in colour and gentle-weight data, then converts the information into a advise. RAW is one form of file structure that your camera can exhaust, and it’s chanced on on devoted cameras be pleased DSLRs and MILCs.

A RAW file is the unprocessed advise data straight from the sensor. It desires to be converted to a usable advise structure thru a program equivalent to Lightroom or Luminar. RAW recordsdata are worthy elevated than JPEG recordsdata, and they regularly don’t gape correct until they are edited. Attributable to this truth, a long submit-processing time is required, and memory playing cards have up faster. But you dwell accumulate a versatile file that will possible be endlessly edited to gape precisely the method in which you desire.

JPEG shots are RAW recordsdata which could possibly perhaps be instantaneously converted by the camera into a structure that’s easy to fragment. At some stage in, on the opposite hand, JPEGs lose one of the significant data captured by the advise sensor.

JPEG recordsdata have widely feeble since 1992, and the long-established intent changed into once to construct up a advise structure that changed into once a exact compromise between high quality and file dimension. Whenever you happen to’re extinct sufficient to be conscious the early days of the bring collectively, that bandwidth changed into once a precious commodity, and a single advise file could possibly perhaps clutch several minutes to in discovering on a dial-up modem. JPEG helped solve that area and like a flash became the dominant structure for digital photos. This legacy lives on on the present time, and almost every digital camera and cell instrument can shoot JPEG photos.

So which structure is most attention-grabbing? That’s a quiz most efficient it is possible you’ll perhaps solution, and it all depends in your photographic dreams. But it undoubtedly’s rather be pleased deciding between a truck and a sedan, a microwave and an oven, or whether to attach on footwear or sandals.

In thoroughly different phrases, it’s no longer a quiz of whether JPEG is most attention-grabbing than RAW or RAW is most attention-grabbing than JPEG. As one more, it’s about deciding when to shoot in RAW or JPEG and why.

fungus shot in JPEG
Fujifilm X100F | 23mm | 1/170s | f/2 | ISO 200.

I didn’t desire to edit this photo, so I shot a JPEG and changed into once perfectly jubilant with the end result.

When to shoot in RAW

There’s no quiz that RAW recordsdata offer worthy extra flexibility for the length of the editing course of. When it comes to getting better highlights, bringing out part within the shadows, adjusting exposure, and all thoroughly different kinds of edits, RAW reigns supreme.

Whereas RAW does have some downsides, the advantages can with out problems outweigh the disadvantages.

In widespread, I indicate shooting RAW within the next eventualities:

You’re shooting paid photos for purchasers

When working with purchasers, you desire the total flexibility it is possible you’ll perhaps accumulate. Presumably the most attention-grabbing-laid plans can regularly lag awry, and despite all your preparedness, it is possible you’ll perhaps peaceable cease up with shots which could possibly perhaps be too dusky, too shining, or want extreme colour-correcting.

This is where RAW excels, because it helps you to recover as worthy data as possible to repair errors or tweak the advise to your liking.

couple portrait
Nikon D750 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | 200mm | 1/3000s | f/2.8 | ISO 400.

Here, the backlighting resulted in a severely underexposed advise. I changed into once ready to attach it aside because I shot in RAW.

you’ll be doing in depth editing

Whenever you happen to could possibly be shooting in coarse conditions, you’re pushing your camera and your expertise to the restrict, or you’re even true taking well-liked images that it is possible you’ll perhaps be editing, then RAW is a correct resolution.

If I’m taking extra than true informal snapshots, I choose to err on the facet of warning; I’ll shoot in RAW, even though I’m no longer definite how worthy editing I’ll be doing.

It is possible you’ll perhaps perhaps desire to edit your shots years later

This one is a small bit complicated, because it’s complicated to foretell whether it is possible you’ll perhaps or gained’t desire to edit your images years or a protracted time down the road.

Some photographers choose to shoot all the pieces in RAW true to be on the protected facet. Whereas it’s very no longer going to foretell the future, it’s complicated to imagine any mission by which RAW recordsdata would present less flexibility than JPEGs or thoroughly different file codecs.

We could possibly reach a level years down the avenue where machine learning and artificial intelligence are ready to present RAW-style flexibility for lossy codecs be pleased JPEG, but we’re no longer there yet. RAW codecs are feeble by world-class institutions be pleased the National Archives within the USA. Such amenities undoubtedly know a ingredient or two about storing shots for the lengthy period of time, and if RAW is correct sufficient for them, then it’s possible correct sufficient for you.

boy running RAW vs JPEG
Nikon D7100 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | 50mm | 1/350s | f/4 | ISO 200.

When my younger other folks were small, I didn’t know as worthy about pictures as I dwell now. I shot all the pieces in RAW, true in case I wanted to edit my photos years later.

When to shoot in JPEG

Some other folks are of the thought that every one images desires to be shot in RAW, but I are inclined to disagree.

Whereas RAWs dwell have advantages over JPEGs, there’s nothing defective with capturing JPEG recordsdata within the event that they give you the results you want. Correct because any other folks shoot in RAW doesn’t mean that you’ll want to!

In widespread, I indicate the utilization of JPEG within the next eventualities:

You be pleased the gape of your camera’s JPEG recordsdata

Presumably the most attention-grabbing most attention-grabbing thing about RAW is moreover one in all its key disadvantages; having the freedom to regulate your photos advert infinitum isn’t worthy of an earnings if you happen to don’t if truth be told desire to edit them.

All camera producers configure their cameras to course of JPEGs with a definite gape or style. As such, the straight-out-of-camera JPEG recordsdata can gape seriously better than RAW recordsdata. And if you happen to don’t idea on editing your images, then these JPEGs are doubtlessly the easier choice.

girl photographed in JPEG
Fujifilm X100F | 23mm | 1/200s | f/2 | ISO 200.

I be pleased the Fujifilm JPEG recordsdata true handsome, and as such, I nearly never shoot in RAW with my Fujifilm camera.

I shot in RAW repeatedly – until I got my Fujifilm X100F camera. I like a flash realized that I reasonably cherished the gape of its JPEG film simulations equivalent to Traditional Chrome and Provia. Almost at present, I had stopped shooting in RAW entirely on my Fujifilm, because I true cherished the JPEGs better. I could possibly perhaps undoubtedly edit the RAW recordsdata, but I noticed over time that I didn’t desire to. I cherished the JPEGs true the method in which they were (and I peaceable dwell!).

Whenever you happen to be pleased how your JPEG recordsdata gape, then don’t terror about RAW and support the utilization of JPEG. It doesn’t affect you any less of an person, or photographer, true because you’ll want to let your camera dwell one of the significant editing for you.

And even supposing JPEG recordsdata can’t be edited as worthy as RAWs, it is possible you’ll perhaps peaceable affect some widespread changes, equivalent to adjusting exposure and correcting the colour. You shouldn’t search data from the identical flexibility that you’d accumulate when editing RAW recordsdata – but when that’s no longer your blueprint, then JPEGs will possible be handsome.

JPEG vs RAW sheep
Fujifilm X100F | 23mm | 1/2000s | f/2 | ISO 200.

I shot this as a JPEG and changed into once peaceable ready to tweak the white balance true rather in Lightroom. Would RAW have worked better? Presumably. But I be pleased this shot anyway.

You’re capturing informal snapshots of guests and family

RAW recordsdata have extra flexibility than JPEG recordsdata – but while you happen to’re shooting hundreds informal images or snapshots of guests, family, and day to day existence, then RAW true could possibly be overkill.

RAW recordsdata soak up extra space in your memory card, they most regularly is a chore to edit, and moreover they are complicated to fragment. The latter is particularly crucial for these prick-of-existence photos, and most informal footage don’t if truth be told require worthy in-depth editing, anyway.

people on a dog walk
Fujifilm X100F | 23mm | 1/480s | f/5.6 | ISO 200

Whenever you shoot JPEG recordsdata, you lose one of the significant flexibleness of the RAW structure – but you affect the flexibility to with out problems fragment photos, and you don’t have to handle conversions and editing blueprint.

On family holidays, it’s now commonplace to fragment memory playing cards earlier than all individuals leaves, true to be sure all individuals has all individuals else’s photos. This is accurate more uncomplicated with JPEGs, since every instrument and dealing system works immense with the JPEG file structure.

You’re photographing sports and posthaste gallop

This would perhaps seem a small bit counterintuitive because sports and gallop footage every so regularly must peaceable be edited in a while. It’s complicated to nail the exposure and white balance when shooting some kinds of sports, which is why photographing in RAW will possible be priceless.

Then yet again, it’s now commonplace to cease up with hundreds and even thousands of photos after a sporting match, particularly if you happen to exercise your camera’s staunch shooting mode. The sheer amount of shots can flip the assignment of editing into an laborious course of that ends up taking some distance too worthy of your time.

boy kicking a soccer ball
Nikon D750 | Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR II | 98mm | 1/750s | f/2.8 | ISO 100.

I shot JPEGs with the Overcast white balance setting, so all I needed to remain changed into once gash a pair of footage, as a replace of meticulously editing the deal of photos I got from this sport.

This skill that, it could possibly if truth be told be a correct ingredient to shoot in JPEG when it is possible you’ll perhaps cease up with a huge amount of photos. It is possible you’ll perhaps perhaps be taught to tweak JPEG settings in-camera, equivalent to lifting the shadows and manually setting the white balance to support uniformity across your images. This isn’t the identical as editing every advise by hand, but it’s loads more uncomplicated!

The interior buffer in your camera gained’t have up as like a flash when shooting in JPEG mode because of the the smaller file dimension. This means it is possible you’ll perhaps clutch extra shots with out waiting spherical while your camera transfers them to your memory card. These precious seconds can affect the total distinction at sporting events or thoroughly different eventualities where the gallop comes repeatedly and you don’t desire to cross over a shot.

backyard pool
Fujifilm X100F | 23mm | 1/450s | f/5.6 | ISO 200

A Compromise: RAW+JPEG

Whenever you happen to’re peaceable no longer definite when to exhaust RAW vs JPEG recordsdata, true know that there could be no such thing as a correct solution. Whichever file form you bewitch out is ok as lengthy because it if truth be told works for you.

Whenever you happen to are feeling gratified the utilization of RAW, then immense. Whenever you happen to’d reasonably shoot in JPEG, lag for it. And if you happen to desire the most attention-grabbing of every worlds, you if truth be told can have your cake and relish it, too.

You see, most cameras can allow you to make a resolution a mode known as RAW+JPEG. As it is possible you’ll perhaps search data from, this mode saves every RAW and JPEG recordsdata for every shot. It will relish thru your memory playing cards in a bustle, but as lengthy as you don’t options the elevated storage requirements, it is possible you’ll perhaps steer clear of making the RAW vs JPEG decision altogether and true exhaust every codecs.

coneflower close-up
Nikon D7100 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | 50mm | 1/350s | f/2.4 | ISO 100

RAW vs JPEG: Conclusion

When I first started going in pictures, I suffered from a extreme case of RAW guilt.

I diagram that if I didn’t exhaust RAW, then I wasn’t a precise photographer, because precise photographers shot in RAW. I diagram JPEGs were for the unwashed so a lot and desires to be shunned by any advise-taker who took themselves seriously. It took me some distance too lengthy to designate that this approach to gatekeeping has no field in pictures.

As lengthy as you’ve got a course of that works and you’re jubilant with the end result, then don’t let anybody uncover you that you’re doing it defective. And if you happen to haven’t yet figured out when to exhaust RAW vs JPEG and you’re taking a gape for some advice, then with any luck this article gave you some options.

I’d love to listen to your options about while you shoot in RAW versus JPEG and why. So fragment your thought within the comments piece below!


When to Shoot in RAW vs JPEG (and Why)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 − three =