There’s now not hundreds to separate these two cameras, however this overview from Gerald Undone makes a superior argument for anybody questioning whether or not or now not the brand current Sony FX3 is certainly value the extra cash over the shut to-equal a7S III.
Sony will no question promote a ton of FX3s, and for anybody taking a search to realize a comparatively low-cost ($3,898) route into the company’s cinema-line cameras, it affords the flexibleness and coping with that the a7S III ($3,498) — silent very rather a lot a hybrid digital camera irrespective of its comparatively low-resolution sensor — would not.
Sony has appropriate introduced a firmware trade that brings S-Cinetone to the a7S III, making the two cameras rather a lot additional equal. Click on on here to glean the trade.
Many will question why Sony decided now not to make the most of a search at and squeeze the digital ND filters into the FX3, as having these present would occupy made a rather a lot clearer distinction between the two cameras and made the FX3 a rather a lot additional nicely-organized likelihood for loads of filmmakers. Fstoppers boss Lee Morris and author Oliver Kmia both identified that for them for my portion, this may perhaps nicely occupy made the FX3 a proper substitute over the a7S III.
Will occupy to you are drawn to discovering ten variations between the FX3 and the a7S III, check up on this video from ZY Productions:
Which might you identify and why? Ship us within the feedback under.
Andy Day is a British photographer and writer residing in France. He began photographing parkour in 2003 and has been doing unusual issues within the metropolis and in diversified places ever since. He’s hooked on mountaineering and owns a fairly ineffective canines. He has an MA in Sociology & Pictures which constantly makes him ponder what all of this genuinely formulation.